Showing posts with label city. Show all posts
Showing posts with label city. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Mapping Atlanta

Moving to Atlanta got me interested in the complex politics behind the public transport system here, especially the trains which only run to points along a four-way system: pretty sparse for a city known for its urban sprawl. Most middle-class and affluent people don't seem to take the subway at all and an affluent white school like Emory which has a train line running by it doesn't have a subway stop and doesn't figure on the route map.

This project began at the Data Center at Emory University where I began to learn how to map using Arc-GIS software. I mapped the electric routes across 50 maps of Atlanta from a large 1928 map of the city. I then began to name routes using a source in the Atlanta Historical Journal and am now filling in information about all of these routes as hyperlinks with text and photo data.

This is a slideshow which shows some of this work so far. The project is called Still in Transit because if there's one single thing to learn from a mapping project, it's that there is always going to be more that you can do ;)

It begins by demontsrating how mapping has been used in a contemporary feminist intervention, to map sites of street sexual harassment using apps on the iPhone and droid phones. More here.

Friday, July 23, 2010

Dance Bars

We heard that the dance bars had opened again in Bangalore, so on Friday we decided to go. Under shiny red neon lights spelling out its name, a round security guard with a round face stood guarding a heavy, padded black door, looking expectant. It was only 7 p.m.



"Dance bar," he said to us, cheerfully, standing firmly against the door. Dance bar, we agreed, in English. We want to go in, we told him, in Kannada. "Girls dancing," he offered, still smiling, still against the door. We moved towards him, pushing the door open ourselves. He stood aside willingly enough, smile pasted in place.



We found ourselves in a tiny enclosure, stairs leading off steeply to the left, and a man looking helpless on the right. Ahead of us, another black door. The man waved his arms about a bit ineffectually, and then stood aside as we pushed our way in. The door opened to blasts of thundering music, a starkly empty room, a neglected bar. In the dim lighting we made out a bunch of tall girls dressed in shiny ghaghra cholis hanging out by the bar, all facing the door. We looked at them, they looked at us. The place was empty; the music was deafening. A waiter-type man materialised on my left, looking unsure of what to do now, his notepad and pen hovering in mid-air. Breaking the impasse, I leaned in to him: "The music is very loud". He agreed. "Is there an upstairs?" We could barely hear ourselves shout. He signalled "no" - "as loud". We looked at each other. The girls looked at us. The strobes caught the tiny mirrors on their clothes, making flecks of light dance around the bar in mad circles. We left.



The night seemed still after the music, although it was a Friday and waves of people were spilling out on to the pavements, hovering around juice bars and paan stalls. Feeling we owed him an explanation, we told the security guard outside, "Music was too loud". He heard us - "Music perfect," he said, still smiling.



Two hours later at ten p.m. we went back. All kinds of men were streaming in and out through the doors we had so confidently pushed open. Bald men, tattooed men, men-you -wouldn't-remember-later-that-night, men-in-white-shirts-and-white-pants, men looking uncertain. The security guard was still smiling, but he looked as though he would rather be elsewhere. Maybe at the juice bar next door. We waited for a third friend outside and threw him a question idly: "Is it crowded inside?". He considered it. He agreed. We began to ask some more questions, killing time. His smile began to fade. A man at the juice bar leaned across, cigarette poised in his left hand, plastic juice cup in his right. "Why do you want to go in," he wanted to know. "It's not allowed, it's a dance bar". Don't deny a Bangalorean the right of entry to a place of pleasure: it amounts to a serious rights-violation in a city teeming with apolitical neoliberals. We began to get riled. A bouncer was summoned. A manager was consulted. We pleaded, explained, firmly insisted. Finally the doors opened; the security guard maneuvered us in with his palms sprawled upon our backs.



A bouncer ushered us up the steep staircase respectfully and in through a door that was held ajar. Inside, an eruption of music, strobes, dancing mirrors... and indifference. Ten or so girls, mostly tall, eight of them a size zero, two of them lushly curved, danced indifferently in a room that flashed light, and the images of plunging necklines, off its ceilings. Pillars in the middle were mirror-encased, inviting light and colour on its tall surfaces. Women stood around the main dance floor in sarees and glittering cholis, moving their hips desultorily, swaying their heads, framed by long straightened hair, to the music. They danced slowly, an abstract look on their faces in a sort of half-hearted gesture of seduction as their reflections bounced their sinewy outlines back at them. Occasionally they moved in to the mirrors, performing a gradual, somewhat vague dance of grace addressed to their own images: caressing, hugging, pouting, provoking themselves. These were intensely intimate moments, girls looking enraptured by their slowly swaying bodies.



We picked our way through the mass of dancers to a table that the bouncer was standing by. We joined a circle of men, sedate, sombre, framing the outer circle of the tiny room. We sat next to each other wondering where to look. A manager came up, gave us firm handshakes. We were bona fide, decent, members of the establishment now, Invitees. Menus were handed to us, parallel lines of inspired numbers - Rs. 250 for a lime juice forming the base of the pyramid of spiralling prices.



We ordered and then kicked back. Then we wondered where to look. We looked at the DJ, the scurrying waiters, the bored man next to us, seated alone. We looked upward at the mirrors, we looked at the reflection of the girls. We couldn't bring ourselves to look at the girls. We looked at a table of three who occasionally handed money to a tall girl in blue swaying violently in front of them and then splaying herself across the mirrors. Money was thrown occassionally, dutiful waiters placed wads of ten rupee notes in a pigeonhole system of numbers, each for a girl. A group of men in white shirts and pants walked in energetically and began fluffing up wads of ten rupee notes that fluttered in an arc around the plump girls who moved in front of them for a personal show. Waiters collected it; placed it in the box for number two. The tall girl in chiffon blue asked us not to put our feet on the leather couch. The group of three gave some more money; a man in white pants tried to jive with a dancer before being escorted firmly back to his seat by a vigilant bouncer. By now we had begun looking.



First we looked at our reflections off the ceiling. We looked at the men around us who barely noticed us despite our being the only women there apart from the dancers. We looked at the DJ, at the harried waiters, at the managers, one for each side of the floor. We looked at the reflections of the girls dancing to the mirrors, sometimes catching their eye in the glass. Then, finally, we began looking at the girls.



The music was deafening by now: Hindi, Tamil, English. Kishore Kumar songs, Lady Gaga hits. Our feet were tapping, our bodies were swaying. The girls were barely dancing, but they were swaying, smiling, fixating on their reflections in the mirrors. The girl in front of us was young, she looked like me. Her sky blue chiffon saree was falling off. She wore a faded red thread wound several times around her right wrist. An older girl instructed her on how to drape her saree. The young girl looked bored sometimes, impatient at others, barely curious about the men, or the music, or us. We were staring by now, wondering why a certain set of eyebrows made such a fiery arc; why a blue chiffon saree so persistently snaked down a fragile shoulder; how the group seemed to move loosely but surely to face all sides of the bar.



Soon we had our favourites. We watched them, they - sometimes - watched us back. We gave some money, in tens, in a five hundred rupee note, walking up to the girl to hand it over. They watched us patiently, sometimes moving gradually in or view to dance for us, but never explicitly. Men's eyes darted looks at us, increasingly inquisitive and persistent as the night wore on and our beer began emptying. The man on my right began moving in as our beer finished and our bill arrived. "They won't give me my bill," he said conspiratorially. The girl I paid was fighting a losing battle with her saree pallu. She looked dejected and bored, chewing gum vacuously. The girl my friend had paid had begun dancing for her. Mirror light flashed, the alcohol had made us numb and expectant, but we decided to leave.



Outside it was a cool monsoon night. The security guard looked pleased when he saw us emerge and put his hand on my shoulder as I walked past. He asked for a tip. "Next time," we told him, "when we come tomorrow night". People turned to look at us as we walked toward the auto stand, the music from the dance bar fading in our heads, a strange sort of exhilaration and contentment charging through our bodies. Out in the open, despite its sparse streets and nightly profusion of staring men, the city seemed safe and secure now, inviting us into its darkness.

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Ban city

(Pic: The Hindu)
No dancing. No live music in places that serve alcohol. No partying beyond 11:30. No smoking in restaurants and bars. No very loud music.

Welcome to Bangalore, 2008.

Here's a story that Lalitha Kamat and I wrote, on the moral politics behind the protests and the laws, and how they take place upon the imagesof women's bodies, but also looking at the urban politics framing the background to the issue:

IT, BT and Bangalore's Moral Economy

A bit here:

The suggestion of a Shanghai-Singapore framework as a discretionary model that presumably discourages "sleazy girlie bars" while retaining the "stylish," "hip" nightclubs is another step along the pathway that has carved out the growth of Bengaluru along a deepening faultline. Since the liberalisation policies of the 90s at least, Bangalore has grown unevenly along a cleavage situating the Information Technology and Biotechnology (IT and BT) "corporate" boom on the one side, and the slower, older, more staid city on the other. The issues surrounding the imposition of these regulations are poised along this crisp divide, and occurring repeatedly in different ways with varying permutations (of class, dress and occupation) are images of women, stuck in this very verbal and angry tussle between various interest groups.

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Mumbai new year and the thought association game


photo - jasmeen patheja, 2007.


Street sexual harassment

I get that by dressing a certain way, you're not asking for it. i get it because it must be true: the only two times i have filed an FIR for harassment i was dressed most "modestly". i get it because what kind of regressive thinking would you have to be indulging in, to blame the harassed, not the harasser. it's hard to protect yourself without knowing what part of you will cause umbrage and invite violence, or cause (apparently) irresistible titillation and invite violence. i get the larger picture, the ethical implication of suggesting someone asked for it and yet... what story (of globalisation, of transition, of woman's body, of disjuncture, of private-public) are the details telling us....?

young women - glamour district - JW Marriott - black dress, jeans - teasing - mob of 40-50 - swear - growing mob - sexual violence.

From the HT - Jan 01, 2008

I'm thinking globalisation- societies in transition - female body as site for battles over "owning" and "belonging" - women relatively safe in private spaces of... home? (hardly!), malls, money=safety - private images coming out in the public - middle class women's huge variance in lifestyle as they negotiate a large difference between private liberated and public 'respectable' persona...

This is Arjun Appadurai on the "pains of cultural reproduction in a disjunctive global world" -

...young men (in particular) come to be torn between the macho politics of self-assertion in contexts where they are frequently denied real agency, and women are forced to enter the labour force in new ways on the one hand, and continue the maintenance of familial heritage on the other. Thus the honor of women becomes not just an armature of stable (if inhuman) systems of cultural reproduction, but a new arena for the formation of sexual identity and family politics as men and women face new pressures at work and new fantasies of leisure...


**
And then here we are at Majestic bus stand, for many days in the week, the centre of my little universe. All the buses seem to lead there and buses from there lead to everywhere. The journeys are pleasant enough (although it is tiring to stand and play this-is-the-two seater-i'm-next-in-line-for games with the aggressive elbow joints of tired looking tiny women). Many buses have a small semi-open sun roof. Glass windows are shut unlike the dust-caked auto rides. Distances hurtle past; views are more engaging from this vantage point - you can look over the tops of heads all crowded around to see a little girl holding a long stick between her teeth and riding a unicycle along a taut wire near the Malleswaram circle.

And then suddenly the joyride ends. The bus does a giant sweep into the Majestic bus stand, people have begun edging to the doors to jump out, already many are on their cell phones explaining, "Sorry, my bus got delayed, I'm at Majestic, I am just reaching..." and then suddenly it's a free-for-all.

Hands brush you, fingers knead you, eyes lust, mouths curve, entire bodies come up suddenly, unstoppably, rushingly against you. It's all in rush hour traffic: no time to stop to say, "Hey!" or to see anything beyond the backs of receding heads, the disappearing ends of fingers.

And on every bus bay that tiny, new fangled little flat screened (it is, isn't it? I can't see so well...) TV, shouting out, reminding us that we are in Bangalore! A super star region, characterised by “a new economic landscape comprising high level, internationally-oriented financial and business services” (Perrons). Whoo hoo! So what can we expect from the tiny, shiny TVs at the central bus stand? Bus timings? Delays? Emergency contact numbers?

It's a streaming video of Bollywood songs. Women gyrate, men rub their hands over them lustfully, women close their eyes, gasp and shudder in prolonged enjoyment.

And so in that surge of sexuality radiating so unapologetically from every tiny TV screen in every tiny bus bay, in that surge the men get caught up, reaching out, groping, discovering. A microcosmic experience of the Bollywood original, encouraging them from the pillar tops and emanating signals that whisper approval at reaching out and living (even a watered down version) of the Great Indian Sex Dream.

**
Modern, modern Bangalore with its Hard Rock Cafe which is dutifully signposted "Hard Rock Cafe Bengalooru", where bartenders flirt with you and ask you whom you're looking for; utter whoops of joy every now and then to keep the pace upbeat and frenetic; offer you more than one kind of beer... in this modern Bengalooru where women work for Google and test product design for Nokia, work and live in shiny enclosures on the city outskirts in high surveillance buildings, how do women schizophrenically negotiate dealing with the difference between public and private space? How do they become modern citizens?

Even as they adopt professional avatars of modernity based on ideas of scientific progress, presumably meant to be accompanied by the assumption of similarly progressive notions of modern citizenship, how do they negotiate the realities of class, caste and regional politics that inflect their actual functioning as citizens outside of the rarefied work environment?



Or, do they never leave their private spaces at all?
When, and if they do, are they 'asking for it'?

Monday, December 17, 2007

8th cross

jasmine sellers, glass bangle sellers, beads and baubles strung on wooden crucifixes along the pavement by men who are constantly on the move, away from police whistles. kaaju barfi, hardware on the street, shoe repair, family temple, Bata stores. Nothing much changes on this street, but there are more jewellery stores here than ever before and obnoxious ads which there never used to be.

disconnect and hooks


so it's a saturday night and Girl and i decide we will rupture our usual stay-home-and-pretend-to-work routine by actually going out. i'm thinking shady bar, she's thinking posh bar. i'm thinking i don't mind anywhere as long as i can get a drink. we're both pretty much dressed to the gills. we decide on a not-too-shady, not-too-posh bar and walk in. and then everything seems to happen all at once.

the bar is full and we're thinking we might squeeze in somewhere along it until a table frees up, but we didn't bargain for the manager. he notices us seconds after we enter and swoops down to greet us. a sofa chair is pulled out of nowhere and offered to us in a tiny alcove. a table is promised. a menu thrust upon us. in minutes he has pulled apart the seating at the table of a cosy couple. two extra chairs have been distended from their arrangement and a tiny table conjured up from behind the bar – to make us a cosy table for two. through the evening, waiters descend asking if we are alright. our email id's are requested, our satisfaction levels queried after. everytime we look around, a hovering manager checks in on us.

but apart from these many connections with the managerial staff, we are strangely disconnected. bangalore has never felt this alien. droves of men walk in, in horizontal stripe tee shirts and collared shirts. i have never seen so many collared shirts on a saturday night before. Girl plays spot-a-hot person. i spot a good looking girl walking in to sit at the table next to us, but not much else. we can't seem to find anybody we would want to make conversation with. anybody interesting-looking. we play guess-their-profession. we guess HR, management, software. yawn.

the couples at the table next to us are playing a game too. guy in horizontal striped shirt is playing “how hot is my girlfriend”. his girlfriend's the one we both thought was hot when she entered. the other girl at their table is having her birthday. waiters bring her a little pastry with a lone candle wavering upon it. muted music plays happy birthday. the other three at the table get excited and begin singing happy birthday and photographing her blowing out her candle on their cell phone cameras. they look around to check if people are watching. horizontal stripe shirt man shouts that drinks are on him. he adds on him “at home”. his girlfriend laughs. he goes back to playing “hot or not” about her, now badgering the others at the table to rate her. i'm tempted to raise my glass in a toast to the birthday girl but she isn't looking at me, and Girl is darting them dirty looks.

weird, its been a while since i went out and couldnt find a single person i wanted to go up to and engage in conversation. it's like playing one of those games in a movie museum where a movie runs on a tiny tv screen and you have to feed in dialogue to a microphone, attempting to coincide your conversation with the actors movements. of course you're always functioning completely separately from them and there's a huge disconnect on screen. in a museum its kinda funny, but in real life, watching people streaming in and out, and chattering at tables, it feels sort of like you're watching yourself from the outside, a sort of out-of-body experience.

the droves of single men are scattered around the pub, but they're united by their expression, a sort of waiting expression. it's like they are waiting for something big to happen and just killing time till it does. no one's really into their conversation much or look like they are savouring their drink, instead there is a restlessness in the air, and expectancy. and there's a disconnect with them that i can't pinpoint. it's like there's no hook linking any part of them to any part of us. i can't fathom it. next time, girl and i say we will go to another bar and check about hooks there. maybe we'll have more luck.

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Where is the ladies?

The Tate Modern has new displays on cities - looking at them in terms of space, density, speed and so on with statistics, photographs and films to document the dynamics of some of the world's largest cities.

What fascinated me enough to go back again was Paromita Vohra's Q2P.

The second time around, I watched bits of it with a contrarian friend (I wish he would read this blog, but he's busy scrabbling for controversy and virtual fights elsewhere in cyberspace and none of that here!) who got completely peeved with what he seemed to consider the upper caste gaze of the filmmaker and her condescending jibes at the sort of Regular Roadside Romeo figures (in caps to mark my utmost respect for this ubiquitious constituent of life on an Indian street) who were being constantly interviewed through the film.

The filmmaker is out exploring the marginalising of women in India's public spaces and the reductivist view of her (seen as an object, rather than as a real human being with bodily functions, for instance) in popular culture and in people's attitudes and then watching this translate onto the larger canvas of public planning and city growth that ignores women.

The filmmaker chooses the gendered spaces of women's toilets looking at their practicalities and realities to reflect on the space women occupy in public. She looks at where they are situated, how small they are, how much they cost to use, who else occupies them and so on. She interviews members of the Sulabh group who set up a network of public toilets, asking them questions that relate to women's use. She interviews men. The interviews with the men are what friend objected to - most interviewees produced sniggers or looks of disbelief from the audience as they offered views which suggested they could not view women as needing to perform the same functions as them or having real needs.

Friend thought this was pointless - almost as if she was using the unknown man on the street as a fall guy and poking fun at his views? Perhaps because you could argue that these men were part of a larger culture and could not be isolated from it and then ridiculed in these rarified spaces of art gallery/sensitive film audience?

Seemed to me though like she was using irony to demonstrate how institutionalised some beliefs were. Does she not have the license to do that, to make her larger point more effective?

Watch the clip, but better still watch the entire film if you can.